Text
Defendant
Punishment A, C, and D is a fine of KRW 1.5 million, KRW 1.2 million, KRW 1.2 million, and Defendant E.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
E On September 25, 2014, the Daejeon District Court rendered a judgment ordering two years of suspended execution, observation of protection, and community service for 80 hours in the month of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with the execution of public duties, and became final and conclusive on August 27, 2015.
The Defendants are members of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Co., Ltd. as the producers of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Council in the Asia-si I.
1. The Defendants committed a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) by Defendant B, C, A, and D on January 17, 2014, the Defendants committed an unfair labor act, such as the closure of a previous illegal workplace and the discrimination against, and the negotiation of wages in bad faith with respect to, metal union workers at around 10:00 on January 17, 2014.
I think, while conducting the relevant internal assembly, I found that the members of the 2nd floor production technology team office at the 2nd floor production technology team office at the 2nd unit office at the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 2nd
The term "campling off the video data" means "campling off the body of the victim K with double hand, flapsing the body of the victim K with walls, and the defendant D flapsing the body of the victim K with the left hand and flapsing the victim K face with the victim K's flapsing, and the defendant A flapsing the scene by the victim K.
J Based on the fact that the cell phone was received from the chief M of the management division, the victim K was flobbbbed with the flobbbbb, and the victim K’s bridge was flobed over the floor, and the defendant C was flobed to the victim N(53 tax) of the head of the State 1 head of the Gu at the site.
Whether or not to promote this new promotion
"...." When the victim N was avoided, the victim N was able to catch the victim N, her hand, clothes, etc., in his arms, and was led about about 10 meters out of the above production technology team office.
(b)in this regard.