logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.29 2017고단6439
국민체육진흥법위반(도박개장등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won, Defendant D and E shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person, other than an entrusted business entity, who is the Seoul Olympic Winter Games Foundation or the Korea Sports Promotion Foundation or a person who is not an entrusted business entity, shall provide property or property benefits to persons who win the result by issuing voting rights for sports promotion or others similar thereto, and no person shall open a space for gambling for profit.

Defendants, 501, J building 501 in the Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, operated the total board of “K,” which is an illegal sports gambling site established in the Republic of Korea, Defendant A, who installed computers and monitors at the above place and managed the site operation by obtaining membership DB from the operators of the above site without the name, and recruited employees to publicize the above site, and recruited to publicize the above gambling site and recruit members.

The Defendants conspired as such from November 2016 to March 2017 (Defendant D’s participation from January 8, 2017, and Defendant E’s participation from February 22, 2017) operated an illegal sports gambling site by means of predicting the winning pass of the sports game and obtaining a prize in accordance with the pre-determined dividend rate from the winner of the game, and acquiring a prize in accordance with the betting amount from the winning winner.

As a result, the Defendants committed an act of providing property or property benefits to those who win the result by issuing things similar to the right to vote for sports promotion in collusion with their names, and at the same time opened a space for gambling for profit-making purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant B, C, and D

1. The respective legal statements of the defendant A and E;

1. A suspect examination protocol on behalf of the public prosecutor on the defendant A;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the defendant B, C, D, or E;

1. Protocols of police seizure and list of seizure;

1. Each investigation report (L gambling.).

arrow