1. The Defendant’s KRW 149,282,498 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from August 1, 2018 to December 14, 2018 for the Plaintiff.

1. In addition to the whole purport of the pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1-2 (including additional numbers) as to the cause of the claim, it is recognized that the plaintiff supplied the defendant with the electronic equipment manufacturing amounting to KRW 262,082,498 from around September 2017 to July 2018, and received KRW 108,600 from the defendant, whichever is less 153,482,498 (=262,082,498-108,60,000), barring special circumstances, the defendant is obligated to pay 149,282,498 (including additional numbers) the defendant's factory rent subsidy for the defendant's factory rent subsidy for the plaintiff from around 20,000, deducting KRW 149,282,498, and delay damages from the date of final transaction to July 1, 2018 to the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint from August 1, 2018 to 16.

2. As to the Defendant’s assertion and its determination, the Defendant promised to bear 50% of the Defendant’s factory rental deposit of KRW 20,000,000 and monthly rent of KRW 280,00 ( KRW 2,000) and management fee. Upon the Plaintiff’s request, the Defendant provided the Plaintiff with one employee for seven months from January 2018, and borne the Defendant with labor cost of KRW 14,00,000,000, which the Plaintiff promised to deduct the above subsidies and labor cost of KRW 14,00,000, which the Plaintiff promised from the goods price to be paid to the Plaintiff.

However, as seen earlier, there is no clear evidence to support the Plaintiff’s agreement related to the rental of the factory exceeding KRW 4,200,000 recognized by the Plaintiff, and there is no evidence to support the Defendant’s one employee for the period of seven months. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion on the above deduction is difficult to accept.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted for all reasons.