A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

30,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 7728]

1. On September 22, 200, the Defendant: (a) around September 22, 2014, placed about 0.2g of the psychotropic drugs-related Mebanes (hereinafter “Handphones”) in a single-use injection machine; and (b) injected narcotics into the left bloodline and administered them.

2. Although the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on September 12, 2014, the Defendant injected approximately 0.2 grams of opphones in the same manner as in paragraph (1) at the same place as in paragraph (1), and administered narcotics.

[2014 Highest 8692] Notwithstanding that the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, around 16:00 on October 22, 2014, around 300, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs, which are psychotropic drugs acquired from the viral situation in Busan Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, by means of inserting approximately 0.03g of Mepta (tentatively referred to as 'copon') in a single-use injection machine, dilution with water, and then administering them in a way of injectinging them to their left arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Notification of appraisal results of narcotics prepared by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office scientific investigation officers;

1. A report on arrest;

1. Photographs (the result of the examination of urine simple reagents, part of medication, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment, etc. of a copy of judgment);

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. of Specific Crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (based on the market price of 100,000 won for a one-time medication on the market board) is that the Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he had been sentenced to several suspended sentence for the same crime, and immediately after being prosecuted for committing the instant crime under Article 278 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., the Defendant did not reflect on the instant crime, such as committing a crime committed under the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.