1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The grounds for the plaintiff's claim are as shown in the annexed sheet.

2. Article 250 of the Civil Procedure Act permits a lawsuit to confirm the authenticity of a deed, as a result, the parties cannot dispute whether a document verifying legal relations is authentic or not, and as a result, the dispute itself concerning legal relations or at least contributed to the resolution of the dispute itself. Therefore, in order for a lawsuit to verify the authenticity of a deed to be lawful, there is a benefit to seek confirmation of the authenticity of the document.

However, in a case where a lawsuit has already been filed over a legal relationship to be proved by a certain document, the dispute can be settled, and thus, the filing of a lawsuit to confirm the authenticity of the document separately does not have the interest in confirmation, unless there are special circumstances.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Da29290 Decided June 14, 2007). The annual edition as indicated in the [Attachment] (hereinafter “instant deed”) is merely a part of filing a claim with an investigative agency, and when the authenticity of the document becomes final and conclusive, it is difficult to deem that the dispute itself is resolved or at least would be significantly helpful for the settlement of the dispute itself. Moreover, it is unlawful because C filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff on the claim for a loan, such as the content of the instant deed, and it is recognized that the fact that C continues to exist as Chuncheon District Court Branch Branch 2016Na1042, there is no benefit of confirmation.