1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant B’s KRW 20,000,000 and its amount from May 9, 2017:

B. Defendant C is charged with KRW 10,000,000.

1. Claim against Defendant B, C, and D

A. Based on the claim, the above Defendants borrowed money from the Plaintiff as set out below [Attachment 1]. The Defendants requested the Defendants to pay the said money on September 30, 2016, 2012 CD 3D 20 on December 31, 2015, 300,000 on June 28, 2016, although the Plaintiff requested the Defendants to pay the said money on October 30, 2014 [Attachment 1: Plaintiff’s loan details against Defendant B, C, and D], the Defendants did not pay the said money even in the Plaintiff’s continuous demand.

(b) Article 1 of the applicable law) Defendant B and D: Judgment based on the deeming of confession (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) Defendant C: Decision by service by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Claim against Defendant E

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff, as indicated below, lent to Defendant E a total of KRW 14,830,000 for 11 times between May 14, 2012 and October 5, 2015, as set out in the following [Attachment 2].

Notwithstanding the loan 5,00,000 on May 14, 2012 1, 201, 200 7,000 7,000 on September 11, 2014, 200 2, 510,000 on September 26, 2012 8, 2003 510,003 on April 10, 2015, 203, 2009 990,000 on April 25, 200 on April 30, 2015, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff paid 1,000,000 on April 30, 200 to the Multi-Stage Sales Association (the Plaintiff’s total 1,00,000,000 on September 840, 2015, E-104, 208, 2005, 2014

Part of the money claimed by the Plaintiff as the borrowed money was directly remitted to the Defendant, and if the Plaintiff remitted money to the Defendant to purchase goods from the said company, the Defendant purchased goods, such as Oral fee, etc. from the company and sent it to the Plaintiff.

The money is paid to the company as the price for the goods through the defendant.