A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 26, 2012, at around 00:50 on November 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the grounds that he franchising female descendants would incur a trial expense to employees who assaulted C; and (b) arrested the police officer dispatched as a flagrant offender, and (c) arrested the police officer as a flagrant offender, the Defendant used the DNA’s personal information, a member of the sports center that he works in order to conceal the fact that the unpaid amount of a fine

1. On November 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 02:47, the Defendant: (b) received an investigation into the instant assault case from the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station Criminal and the Seoul Youngdong Police Station Criminal 2-11 located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul; and (c) entered D’s personal information in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared as if D stated.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the signature of the other party D for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place under paragraph (1), issued the protocol of interrogation of a suspect containing a forged signature to E, who is aware of the fact, as if it was duly formed, and exercised the protocol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to suspect suspect interrogation protocol;

1. Article 239 (1) and Article 293 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the point of exercise of a false investigation or signature);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;