logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2015.08.20 2015고단128
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Busan District Court on March 4, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 12, 2015.

1. On February 2014, the Defendant interfered with the cosmetic service around February 2014, 2014: (a) in the “Eunching room” operated by the victim D in Smuggling around February 2014; and (b) in the case where a majority of customers are heard, the Defendant’s foregoing victim’s “chaking .m. opening”

h. Neither female nor female;

We are exempted from clothes.

Around February 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s beauty room operation by force by avoiding the disturbance for about 20 minutes in a manner of cryping it. On February 2014, 2014, the Defendant interfered with Lestop’s business is “H” operated by the victim G in the horse F at the end of the end of the day on February 2014, and without any justifiable reason, “packs the customer’s name, who is the customer.”

Magrmos marina

The Defendant interfered with the victim’s operation of the Lestop by force for about 30 minutes in a manner referred to as “a stringing a dog, shringing a dog, and stringing off,” and “a stoping the victim I”. On February 27, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business on February 27, 2014, at the “J restaurant” operated by the victim I, who is in the Camyang F, around 16:51, 2014, and the victim’s “a stoping the victim,” among customers in a name-free manner.

There is still power in Korea.

Chewing year. Chewing year. Doing year, it interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force for about one hour by using a string of the dog and by exceeding the string of the dog.

4. On February 27, 2014, the Defendant interfered with Schlage’s business: (a) around 18:04 on February 27, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s Schlage’s work by force for about 30 minutes in a way that the Defendant she was able to see the victim’s “Musa” operated by the victim L in Stak-si, Mayang-si; (b) in a manner that the customer was able to see his/her name in a large lucent, while the customer was able to hear, and (c) he/she was off and off his/her

5. On March 18, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business at the “O restaurant” operated by the Victim N in K around 21:20 on March 18, 2014.

arrow