1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,00,000 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from December 2, 2015 to September 3, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

1. In full view of the facts described in Gap evidence 2, 3, and 11 and the fact-finding results in each fact-finding with respect to the C/L of this court, the plaintiff suffered her buttex-cell type (a fat-type fat-type fat-type fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out fat-out).

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the above facts, it is acknowledged in light of the empirical rule that a physician at the Defendant hospital was somewhat suffering from pains or duplicatings on the surgery before removal from the Plaintiff’s body, due to negligence without removing the Plaintiff’s duplicatings, which was inserted in the Plaintiff’s body at the time of the surgery, and thus, the Defendant, the employer of the Defendant hospital, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for emotional distress incurred by the Plaintiff.

B. As to the amount of consolation money, the following circumstances recognized as a comprehensive consideration of the entire purport of the arguments as a result of fact-finding on the Head of the Medical Appraisal Board of this Court, this Court’s C/L, and G Association Medical Appraisal Board, i.e., the Plaintiff removed the aforementioned c/mick from the above C/L to the simple treatment once, and the Plaintiff applied the above C/L to the above C/L.