1. All of the plaintiffs' primary claims are dismissed.

2. The Defendants jointly share the Plaintiff A with KRW 1,431,50, Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff B.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Basic facts 1) Plaintiff A and F (GG students) were students attending the second and second grade 9 of H middle schools. 2) Plaintiff A decided on March 22, 2016 to F on the ground that F was unable to play a game, and that F did not run a game.

Accordingly, F was put to the Plaintiff, and thereafter F and the Plaintiff were under way to the other Party A several times, while F and F were under way to the other Party A, F were under way to take the face of the Plaintiff A four times on the ground that the Plaintiff was under way to the Plaintiff at the time the Plaintiff was under way to the Plaintiff at the time of being under way to the Plaintiff, and thereby damaged the Plaintiff’s face, and caused the Plaintiff A to suffer the injury in need of the stabilization fee for the ten-day period.

(hereinafter “instant harmful act”). Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and the Defendants are F’s parents. [The grounds for recognition: (a) the absence of dispute; (b) Party A’s evidence; (c) Party A’s evidence 1; (d) Party A3’s evidence; (e) Party A’s evidence; (e) Party A5; (e) Party A7 evidence; (g) Party B’s evidence 2; (d) Party B’s evidence 4-1; and (e) the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. The plaintiffs' assertion F does not have any intelligence to change the responsibility of the act, and thus, the Defendants, who are the F’s parental authority, jointly and severally, are liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to F’s act in accordance with Article 755 of the

F has the ability to assume responsibility.

Even if the Defendants did not fulfill their duty to protect and educate F, and the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to F’s harmful acts are reasonable causal relation with the Defendants’ protection and culture duty, so the Defendants are liable for compensating the Plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs in collaboration with F.

C. It is difficult to find it difficult to comprehensively consider the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff as to the primary claim that the F is not capable of changing the responsibility to the F. Rather, F is a student who was at the second grade of middle school and was at the second grade of middle school, F is still at the age of 13 months, and F is more than her head because there is no thought that F is still at the age.