1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on June 30, 2017 by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on a case No. 2016Da2325 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 3, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a petition for registration invalidation trial on the instant registered petition with the Intellectual Property Tribunal No. 2016Da2325 against the Defendant, claiming that the nonobviousness of the instant petition is denied by the prior petition No. 1 and No. 2 of the instant lawsuit. (2) On June 30, 2017, the Intellectual Property Tribunal dismissed the Plaintiff’s petition on the ground that the instant petition for registration petition is not denied by the prior petition No. 1 and No. 2 (hereinafter “instant petition for registration petition”) on the ground that the nonobviousness is not denied by the prior petition No. 1 and No. 2.

B. The name of the device of this case (Evidence A 2): B/Registration date/E: the defendant's claims 1; the rubber sculptures are connected to a number of rubber sculptures so that the air can be injected through the air injection; the above rubber plates are completely sealed; and the above rubber plates are connected to the outer surface of the skin and the outer upper part of the skin is formed; the polych Ethical fiber, poly Ethic fiber fiber, polybin fiber fiber, polybine fiber, polybine fiber, polybin fiber, polybin fiber, or one of them, or one of them, and the two or more of the two or more of the rubber plates, i.e., e., e., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., e., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g.