1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on November 10, 2014 on the case No. 1116 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 12, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) against the Defendant, who is the registrant of the Intellectual Property Tribunal; (b) was publicly notified prior to filing an application by the Intellectual Property Tribunal No. 1; and (c) from the 1 and 2 of the prior petition, a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the device pertains (hereinafter “ordinary technician”).

(2) On November 10, 2014, the Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal rendered the instant trial ruling dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim for invalidation trial on the ground that the nonobviousness was not denied by the prior petition No. 1, but by the prior petition No. 2, the nonobviousness was not denied by the prior petition No. 2.

B. The name of the Defendant’s design of this case (Evidence 2) 1: B) filing date/registration date/registration number: Claim C/D/E 3 ( Claim C 1) claims are installed outside of the feed tank (102) and the transport screen (104) and the back of the feed tank (106), and the drug 108 (104) connected to the above vertical transfer axis (102) and the normal return note for the feed transport vehicle (104); the returning officer is connected to the above-mentioned container (60) and connected to the above-mentioned container (100 (22) for the purpose of transporting the feed; 100 (106) for the purpose of transporting the feed; 10 (10) for the purpose of transporting the feed, the above return officer is connected to the above-mentioned container (108); 2) for the purpose of transporting the feed to the above-mentioned container (20) column 10 (106) column 16) column 10 (10) column 16) column 16.