logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.03.08 2016고정622
대기환경보전법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B is a manufacturer of lighting fixtures, etc., and the defendant is a person in charge of overall affairs as the representative of Gunsan City C.

When the accused operates emission facilities under Article 31 (1) 1 of the Air Quality Conservation Act, he/she shall not perform an act of leaving the preventive facilities in operation.

Nevertheless, on June 8, 2016, the Defendant violated the Air Environment Conservation Act by operating a drying facility (102 square meters x 1 flag) from 2008 at the time of the inspection by an environmental public official, and failing to operate a string of the facility (350 square meters x 1 x 1 mar), which is a preventive facility connected thereto, in a manner of diving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. - A copy of a certificate of reporting the installation of atmosphere emission facilities;

1. - Reporting on the results of an investigation and the application of the legislation.

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Conservation of Air Quality and Articles 89 subparagraph 3 and 31 (1) 1 of the Act on the Preparation of Air Quality (the partial reduction of a fine shall be made, taking into consideration the following factors: the choice of a penalty, the defendant's opposite gender, and the administrative disposition of ten days of business suspension due to the instant case; the age, career, family relationship, etc. of the defendant shall be taken into consideration:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow