2015 Gohap94 Violation of the Oil Pipeline Safety Control Act

1. A;

2. B:

H.D. (Lawsuits) and Kim Il-il (Trial)

Law Firm Date (for Defendant A)

Attorney Lee Jong-ho

법무법인 새녘 ( 피고인 乙을 위하여 )

Attorney Lee Dae-hwan

May 14, 2015

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

Criminal facts

【Criminal Power】

Defendant A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Do) at the Daegu District Court on October 18, 2006 and completed the execution of the above sentence on December 25, 2008.

[Criminal Facts]

1. The co-principal of Defendant A and O0, Section *, Kim & Kim per cent, Section 00, Section 1, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 3, Section 2, Section 3, Section 3, Section 4, Section 2,

Defendant A conspired in sequence to install ices on the pipelines owned and managed by the victim dopco in order to steal petroleum from 00, 100, 200, 100, 200, 100 dollars, 200, and around September 2009, around 19, 2009.

From September 209 to October 20, 2009, the victim dopco at the point near the 4 kilometer point of possession and management by the dopco ( omitted) : * * Da 00, Kim % of the oil pipelines with an underground detection device * * Do mp with the present place of crime * Do mar with Kim Kim %) mar with an electric storage facility installed at the oil pipeline to temporarily store stolen oil from the oil pipeline, and the west Do mp with an electrical storage connected to the oil pipeline to the oil pipeline, and the electrical storage of the oil pipeline was connected to the oil pipeline to the oil pipeline oo, etc., 00, 000, 000, 000, 000, 00, 000, 00, 00, 00, 00, 00, 00, 00, 0, 00, 00.

2. The co-principal committed by Defendant A and B, B, B, B, B, △△△△△△, and ▽△△△△.

Defendant A conspiredd to install ices on the pipelines owned and managed by the victim dopco in order to cut petroleum at B, Y, △△△△△△△, and the Simsan-si ( omitted) around February 2, 2012.

On March 2012, Defendant A decided to commit a crime in the vicinity of the west-si ( omitted). Defendant A and B, etc. in the above west-si sold the land where the pipelines were laid off in the vicinity of the west-si. Defendant A and B, etc. in the above west-si, and had an oil pipeline installed by inserting the land where the pipelines were laid up in the way of inserting. Defendant A and B, etc. installed the oil pipeline by linking the oil pipelines laid underground with an electrical folder and attaching a oil pressure valve to the oil pipeline, which was laid underground, and by linking the pressure valves with an electric string and the oil pipeline connected with a water pressure valve and the oil pipeline. ** The oil pressure facility was installed by linking the oil pipeline to the oil pipeline installed up to the open space.

3 . 피고인 甲과 乙 , 임▣▣ , 차 , 차 의 공동범행

피고인 甲은 乙 , 임▣▣ , 차 , 차▥▥과 2012 . 8 . 경 천안 동남구 ( 생략 ) 에서 석유 를 절취하기 위해 피해자 대한송유관공사가 소유 · 관리하는 송유관에 호스를 설치하기 로 순차 공모하였다 .

2012 . 8 . 경 피고인 甲은 천안시 동남구 ( 생략 ) 에 있는 창고로부터 약 400미터 떨어 진 곳에서 범행하기로 하고 , 임▣▣은 창고를 임대하고 , 2012 . 9 . 경 피고인 甲은 주 변에서 망을 보고 , 乙 , 차目 , 차은 삽으로 송유관이 매설된 땅을 파고 , 임▣▣은 지하에 매설되어 있는 위 피해자가 설치한 송유관에 전기용접기로 유압밸브를 용접하 여 부착하고 전기드릴로 유압밸브 상단과 송유관을 관통하는 구멍을 뚫고 유압밸브를 잠근 다음 유압 호스를 연결한 후 수개의 유압호스를 차례로 연결하여 땅에 매설하는 방법으로 위 창고까지 유압호스를 연결하여 송유관에 석유를 절취하기 위한 시설을 설 치하였다 .

4 . 피고인들과 김 , 이 , 이◆◆ , 장▲스 , 박 * * 의 공동범행

피고인들은 김 , 이 , 이◆◆ , 장 , 박 * * 와 2013 . 3 . 중순경 경북 경주시 남 ( 생략 ) * * * * 연구원 부근에서 석유를 절취하기 위해 피해자 대한송유관공사가 소유 · 관 리하는 송유관에 호스를 설치하기로 순차 공모하였다 .

2013 . 3 . 경부터 8 . 초순경까지 위 * * * * 연구원 근처에서 이◆◆ , 장▲▲은 범행 전체 를 기획하고 , 김 , 이진원은 미리 준비한 장비와 공구를 이용하여 굴토를 하고 대한 송유관공사가 소유 · 관리하는 송유관에 유압호스를 연결하였으나 유류가 새는 것을 발 견하자 이◆◆이 피고인 甲에게 도움을 요청하였고 , 피고인 甲은 피고인 乙에게 다시 도움을 요청하였으며 , 피고인 甲은 망을 보고 , 피고인 乙은 유류가 새는 밸브에 원통의 파이프를 덮어 씌워 전기용접을 한 후 유압호스를 밸브에 연결하고 땅 위로 유압호스 를 연결하여 송유관에 석유를 절취하기 위한 시설을 설치하였다 .

5. Defendant A and the chief of the case, and the joint principal of the case

Defendant A conspired in order to install ices on the pipeline owned and managed by the victim dopco in order to steal petroleum on the spons of the spons around September, 2013 at the spons of the place, this section and around around September, 2013.

피고인 甲과 장소은 송유관이 매설되어 있는 위치를 파악하여 송유관에 석유를 절 취하기 위한 고압호스 , 압력계 등의 시설을 설치하고 절취한 석유를 판매할 수 있도록 송유관 인근에 있는 주유소를 임차하는 등의 일을 담당하고 , 장▲▲은 송유관에 석유 를 절취하기 위한 시설을 설치하는 작업을 하고 주유소에서 석유를 판매하는 등의 일 을 담당하기로 하였다 .

피고인 甲과 장▲▲은 2013 . 9 . 초순경 피해자 대한송유관공사에서 관리하는 송유관 이 매설된 장소 부근인 여수시 율촌면 생략 ) 에 있는 서 * * 소유의 ' * * * 주유소 ' 를 임차 하고 , 2013 . 9 . 9 . 여수시 율촌면 ( 생략 ) 에 있는 김 * * 소유의 폐가를 장▲▲이 평소 알 고 지내던 정 * * 을 통해 임차한 후 , 송유관에 설치할 고압호스 , 압력계 등을 준비하였

그런 다음 피고인 甲과 장▲▲은 2013 . 9 . 중순경 위 폐가에서 이 에게 송유관의 위치를 확인시켜 주면서 폐가 마당을 폐가에서 송유관이 매설된 방향으로 파도록 지시 하고 , 이 은 2013 . 9 . 14 . 부터 2013 . 9 . 하순경까지 폐가 마당에서 정화조 설치를 가 장하여 폐가에서 송유관이 매설된 방향으로 삽 등을 이용하여 깊이 약 1미터 , 폭 약 1 미터 , 길이 약 7미터로 땅을 파 송유관에서 약 1 . 7미터 떨어진 곳에 이르렀으나 , 2013 . 9 . 하순경 폐가주변을 순찰하던 피해자 대한송유관공사 직원들에게 발견되어 범행이 발각될 처지에 놓이게 되는 바람에 작업을 중단함으로써 송유관에 석유를 절취하기 위 한 시설을 설치하려 하였으나 그 뜻을 이루지 못하고 미수에 그쳤다 .

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Kim- per cent, Ma00, Mabal, Mabal * Each prosecutor's protocol of suspect examination on A *

1. Kim- per cent, Ma00, Mabal, Mabal *, Kim-, and Lee, each police interrogation protocol against this case

1. Each prosecutor's statement about Kim 00 and the place;

1. (Omission of Statement by Police) Each police statement;

1. Investigation report (Attachment to On-Site photographs), investigation report (Attachment to a copy of a report on consultation related to Domination), investigation;

Report (Review of Suspect's suspicion and attachment of accomplice's judgment), investigation report (Attachment of accomplice's judgment), investigation report

(Attachment of separate evidence records related to the crime of the use principle in the Yanan City) and investigation reports (as for the crimes in the Yan City, Seosan)

Attachment of a copy of documentary evidence records

1. Court rulings (209Gohap31, 2010Gohap6);

1. Before judgment: Criminal history records and other similar statements (A) and investigation reports (in addition to the judgment of the court of first instance, etc.);

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Each of the provisions of Article 13(1)2 of the Oil Pipeline Safety Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the installation of a facility that steals oil, the selection of imprisonment), Article 13(1)2 and (6) of the Oil Pipeline Safety Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the attempted installation of a facility that steals petroleum, the selection of imprisonment)

(b) Defendant B: Article 13 (1) 2 of the Oil Pipeline Safety Control Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Appointment of Imprisonment)

1. Aggravation for repeated crimes;

Defendant A: Article 35 of the Criminal Act (as to the violation of the Oil Pipeline Safety Control Act in Paragraph (1) of the Judgment)

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Defendant A: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes with punishment prescribed in the violation of the Oil Pipeline Safety Control Act, with the largest punishment)

1. Discretionary mitigation;

Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances are considered for the reasons for sentencing)

The reasons for sentencing)

1. The scope of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Imprisonment of one year and six months to fifteen years;

(b) Defendant B: Imprisonment of one year and six months to five years.

2. Determination of sentence;

Each of the crimes of this case is not good in light of the method of crime, risk of the method of crime, importance of the result, etc. as a matter of course, even though they intend to install or install a ice on the pipeline managed by dopco in order to steal petroleum. However, considering the circumstances indicated in the records of this case including the defendants' age, character and conduct, environment, motive of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment shall be determined by taking into account all the circumstances as shown in the records of this case, including the following circumstances.

Judges Song-ho

Judges Kim Jong-Gyeong

Judge Maximum-type Reserve

1) With respect to the violation of the Oil Pipeline Safety Control Act, the sentencing criteria are not set.