logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.29 2015고정3968
의료법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a herb doctor who operates the “F Hanwon” on the 13th floor of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E building.

No medical person shall run any medical advertisement containing any content that is not objectively recognized or groundless, and shall run any medical advertisement with a false or exaggerated content.

Defendant around November 2014, at the above “F Han-won,” there was a reason why the Defendant failed in the “F Han-won” on the Han-won website (G). The reason was that the Defendant failed in the above reduction Dat With F, and repeated Dat at all times.

From the fundamental point of view, I can success in the Multilater.

’ 라는 글 옆에, 각 속옷만 입은 뚱뚱 한 여자 사진과 날씬한 여자 사진을 나란히 게시한 후 여자들이 배 부위에 위를 촬영한 초음파 사진을 각각 들고 있도록 게시한 후, 그 아래에 ’ 위 축소 전 95mm, 위축 소후 54mm, 위 사이즈 무려 40% 감소!‘ 라는 글을 게시하여, 마치 위축소 다이어트를 하면 위 사이즈가 40% 감소한다는 내용으로 광고 하였다.

However, in fact, 2 chapter 2 of the first-wave photograph used in advertising is the first-wave photograph photograph taken by an oriental medical doctor after drinking about 1.8 liters before the h of the water and the second-wave photograph taken after drinking about about 1 liters of the water after drinking about 6 weeks, and there was a difference in the quantity of the taken water in itself, and in fact the above volume of the water was not reduced objectively by 40%.

Nevertheless, in advertising as above, the defendant is at the bottom of the advertisement "the above pictures are different in the quantity of water taken by the tester by drinking water with a photograph of drinking water until the tester reaches the maximum range of captures subjectively.

“Along with the absence of an additional explanation, I advertised that, if you complete a set, it would be able to be mistaken that the set would have been objectively reduced to 40%.

As a result, the Defendant is not objectively recognized with false or exaggerated medical advertising.

arrow