logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.31 2018고정360
의료법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the Seoul Jung-gu building B and the C Council member in the second floor.

No medical corporation, medical institution, or medical person shall place any advertisement with any content that might mislead consumers by guaranteeing the effect of medical treatment, etc., any advertisement with respect to new medical technology which has not been evaluated as a health and welfare father, any advertisement that contains any content that is not objectively recognized, or any false or exaggerated content.

From March 22, 2017 to May 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the C’s website and Dable log, the Defendant recognized that it was used only in the vicinity of liveram and saccinary of the high-bomb (one-day one-day one-day one-day one-day one-day one-day one-day one-day one-day one-day one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way one-way

The defendant, by the same method, temporarily prevents the treatment technology for extending the life of the next generation, the transition, reproduction, and recurrence of cancer cells from the same method.

It is possible to treat safely even if there is no other method of recovery of womb.

There is no concern about the success of treatment of high level of difficulty cases C Hamh Emph C, hymbling, and hiver type based on MRI.

The phrase “informed the content that is likely to mislead consumers by guaranteeing the effect of treatment,” thereby making an advertisement.

In the same manner, the Defendant applied high-bruptive secting surgery to ambane, extracting cancer, kidy cancer, workplace cancer, etc., but it was not possible to present at all grounds for clinical usefulness according to the treatment purpose, and it is objectively recognized that ambrupting surgery is objectively recognized, and that no ground exists to deny the recovery of ambrus, while advertising high-brupting ambrus to all cancer patients, the Defendant did not absolutely recover ambrusium.

Publicationing “......”

arrow