1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 16, 2004, the Plaintiff entered the hospital on the ground of the following: (a) on September 21, 2004, during the 3 parking training, the Plaintiff was unable to walk for a long time due to the movement of a police officer and the sculpary training; (b) on September 21, 2004, after the sculption training, the said symptoms have deteriorated; (c) on January 7, 2005, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “a hindrance to the initial boundary of an unidentified in detail” as a result of the outside of the National Armed Forces Capital Hospital; (d) was hospitalized at the hospital on the 14th day of the same month, but was hospitalized at the hospital, but was discharged from military service after being judged as Grade 5 in accordance with the inspection rules, such as physical examination, etc. on March 21, 2005.

B. On August 29, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on August 29, 2012 that it was difficult to walk over the long-distance distance at the Yangsan National University Hospital, and that there was a considerable limitation to the Plaintiff’s misperception or flight, and that the Plaintiff’s symptoms showing the negative influence of the water department and a serious decline state constitute the sMA, Spinal Muscopy, which are genetic diseases (hereinafter “instant wounds”).

C. On April 2013, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant wound was a genetic disease, but it continued the previous wound caused by an unreasonable group during the new illness training, etc., and that the instant wound was continuously aggravated rapidly following the occurrence of the previous wound, and that the instant wound was continuously receiving high-level training after being unable to receive appropriate treatment after the occurrence of the previous wound, and applied for registration as a soldier or policeman on duty or a soldier of distinguished service to the State under the former part of Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State”).

However, on July 11, 2013, the defendant suffered from the injury of this case in direct connection with the performance of his/her duties during military service or beyond the natural progress.