logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.10.30 2014구단31456
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 24, 1982, the Plaintiff entered the Gun and discharged from military service on July 22, 1983.

B. On June 13, 2013, the Plaintiff from July 24, 1982 to the Defendant

8. 31. The Defendant filed an application for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State with respect to the Defendant, asserting that, under the training training at the 31th Egympic training center, there was a serious pain and sacrife infy on the part of the Magbro for a unreasonable training, and that, after being placed on the part of the Mag-man without proper treatment, the symptoms of the Mag-man were diagnosed by the Mag-man Hospital for the National Armed Forces Waterworks.

C. On November 13, 2013, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition to determine whether the Plaintiff’s instant wounds were non-conforming to the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation and to notify the Plaintiff of the determination, on the ground that there is no proximate causal link with military duties or education.

Therefore, although the plaintiff filed an administrative appeal, the plaintiff was dismissed on June 24, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 2, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion that he was entitled to the preliminary training during the basic military training period and caused a blusence in both arms and arms while making a blusium, shooting, and shooting, and continued a blusium training without speaking that he could not have any pain due to considerable pains in the supervision, while undergoing the training for each bluscence, complete military training, etc., and continued a bluscence training, which led to extreme pain in the minor exercise after the bluscence, and eventually, the plaintiff was suffering from a bluscence and anti-conscence in the National Armed Forces Waterworks Hospital.

At the time of entrance, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on the instant wounds at the time of entrance, but it was in a state where basic military training is possible to be conducted in a minor state, and rapidly aggravated due to post-entry training.

arrow