A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

One (No. 1) (No. 1) shall be confiscated as soon as seized liter (the “C”).

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who has prepared living expenses by selling scrap iron, etc. which has been disposed of in return to the "E", etc. in Seocho-si.

On January 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) discovered waste in front of G building located in Seopopopo City F, Seopopo City F; (b) turned on a refluor who was in possession of a refluor to facilitate separation of steel scrap metal in front of the wall; and (c) caused public danger, such as fluoring down a fluor of the above building by setting fire by attaching a fluor to the waste fluor; and (d) setting fire by setting fire all the waste fluor of the above building.

In addition, from the above date to April 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) destroyed waste, which is a non-main object, by setting fire to a total of 11 times, as shown in the attached list of crimes; and (b) caused public danger.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. Each field inspection report, reports on results, records of seizure, and list;

1. Each investigation report, application of each photographic statute;

1. Relevant Article 167 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Criminal Code, which caused the public danger by attaching waste, which is no main object, several months, and repeatedly committed the crime of fire-fighting for a considerable period of time. Each of the crimes of this case was filed for an emergency arrest and detention warrant on the ground that some of the crimes of this case were committed, and the request for detention warrant was also filed for the reason that the request for detention warrant was dismissed and released through the examination of the quality of the warrant, and the same crime of this case began to be repeatedly committed since 10 days ago, and each of the crimes of this case was committed with property damage and the public.