logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 11. 29. 선고 2018두52822 판결
(심리불속행) 처분일 현재를 기준으로 3년 이상 계속하여 고유목적사업에 직접 사용한 고정자산에 해당한다는 점은 납세의무자가 증명해야 함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu70955 (27 June 2018)

Title

(C) The taxpayer must prove that the assets are fixed assets directly used for the proper purpose business for at least three consecutive years as of the date of the disposition.

Summary

(Summary) It is difficult to view that the second land of this case was directly used for the proper purpose business for at least three years as of January 15, 2016, when the transfer of this case took place, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

Related statutes

Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow