A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 29, 2015, the injured Defendant committed assault, such as assaulting the victim’s right-hand buckbbucks, which was located in Seongbuk-gu, Changwon-si, Masan-si, and the victim’s victim D (the 62 years of age) and Sickh, which was a customer, and “the victim’s flasium,” and the victim’s cell phone, which was cited in his hand, sent back several parts of the victim’s buckbucks, carping down the victim’s right-hand bucks, and pushed down the victim’s body by hand, thereby making it necessary for the victim to receive approximately seven days of medical treatment.

2. On April 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault at the above location on April 21:45, 2015; (b) assaulted the police officer’s position E in the Changwon Police Station, a police officer, to be arrested as a flagrant offender from the same background E; and (c) the defect to be arrested as a flagrant offender from F in the process of the same situation, such as “marbine, Chewing embare, embare, embare, and embare 9 public officials outside class 9 of the government’s sewage; and (d) the Defendant dumbling E’s e in his hand; and (e) boomed, plucked, plucked, or plicked f with her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of On-Site photographs);

1. Relevant legal assistance toward the crime: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act that interferes with the performance of official duties: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the point of each obstruction of performance of official duties on the market);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the following grounds for sentencing), which are favorable to the defendant;

1. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Type 1 of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the scope of recommendations) (the scope of the obstruction of performance of official duties)

(b)an injury (Scope of recommendations) in general shall be one type (general injury).