The judgment below

The part against the Defendants is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months, Defendant B and I.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence of 10 months imposed by the court below on the defendant A and the sentence of 1 year imposed on the defendant B and I is too unreasonable.

2. Ex officio determination

A. Profits acquired by issuing sports promotion betting tickets under Article 47 Subparag. 1 and Article 26(1) of the former National Sports Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 12348, Jan. 28, 2014; hereinafter the same) or Articles 47 Subparag. 2 and 26(1) of the National Sports Promotion Act shall be subject to the necessary additional collection under Article 51(3) and (1) of the same Act, and the said additional collection shall be subject to the necessary additional collection under Article 51(3) and (1) of the same Act, and the profits subject to the said additional collection shall be related to the relevant criminal act in order to deprive the person of unlawful profits caused by the criminal act

(1) The court below's decision that the court below's decision that the court below's decision that the court below's decision that the court below's decision that the court below's decision that the court below's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the defendant's decision that the

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2008Do1528, Apr. 24, 2008; 2012Do2719, May 24, 2012). (B)

Defendant

The lower court determined as to the additional collection of A and B 76,372,327 won in total 76,377 won in the case of Defendant A and B = (total 725,649,918 won in total - total 534,719,100 won in total) ¡¿ agreed profit rate of 40% in the case of this case.