1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's lawsuit corresponding to the revoked part shall be dismissed;

2.

Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part concerning the collection disposition as of August 3, 2012 and the claim for cancellation of the collection disposition as of August 6, 2014 was excluded from the scope of the judgment of this court because the plaintiff did not appeal.

In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the lawfulness of the claim for revocation of the disposition imposing global income tax on November 3, 2014 among the instant lawsuit, the Defendant imposed KRW 1,05,000 on the Plaintiff on November 3, 2014, the Plaintiff, on November 3, 2014, imposed the interim prepayment of global income tax for the year 2014, but may recognize the fact that the said disposition was revoked and notified to the Plaintiff on February 1, 2017, which was subsequent to the filing of the instant appeal, and thus, the said disposition may no longer exist as it loses its validity.

Therefore, among the lawsuits in this case, the part of the claim for cancellation of the above disposition is already extinguished and the claim for cancellation of the disposition without any legal interest has become illegal.

This part of the defendant's defense is justified.

Therefore, the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance regarding the claim for revocation of the above disposition among the lawsuits in this case shall be dismissed as unlawful, and since the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair, it shall be accepted by the defendant, and it shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's lawsuit corresponding to the revoked part shall