logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2012.07.25 2012고정91
위증
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 20, 2010, Defendant A, at the civil court of Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-dong District Court 2010Gahap4617, the said Defendant appeared and testified after taking an oath as a witness of the foregoing court’s case of cancellation of ownership transfer registration. On May 25, 200, the fact was that E and F, at the D office of Gwangju-gu, intended to enter into a sales contract with the purport that “A witness, E and E and E were to sell and purchase the land in violation of the said contract with the intention of suspending the conclusion of a sales contract with the intention of selling and purchasing the land in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, G 295 m2,90 square meters (1,176 m2, 200,000 won after division of December 23, 200, 176 m2, 2005 m2,000 won, although there was no witness, E and E and E were no witnessess.

2. On October 15, 2010, Defendant B, at the civil court of Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-dong District Court 2010Gahap4617, the said Defendant made testimony after attending and taking an oath of the aforementioned court as a witness for the case of cancellation of ownership transfer registration. On May 25, 2000, the facts revealed that E and F attempted to enter into a sales contract for the said real estate at the D office of Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-dong, or that E were to enter into a sales contract for the said real estate at KRW 140 million, or that E had a direct witness to suspend the conclusion of a real estate sales contract by telephone during the course of entering into a sales contract, even though E had no witness (B), A, F, and E were to enter into a sales contract for only KRW 140 million at the D office of Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-dong, with the purport that the said land was suspended from a sales contract during the phone call.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each part of the defendants.

arrow