logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 05. 26. 선고 2016다207881 판결
(심리불속행) 국세, 가산금 또는 체납처분비는 다른 공과금이나 그 밖의 채권에 우선하여 징수할 수 있음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Na2001497 ( December 18, 2015)

Title

(A) National taxes, surcharges, or expenses for disposition on default may be collected in preference to any other public charges or claims.

Summary

(C) The State’s duty to pay national taxes to a delinquent taxpayer may be collected in preference to civil claims against a third party against a delinquent taxpayer. Since the State is in the position of subrogated to civil claims against a third party against a delinquent taxpayer, it cannot be said that the State has a duty to deliver the amount of claims collected from a delinquent taxpayer to the third party or to appropriate the amount for national tax claims against the third party.

Related statutes

Article 35 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. The appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow