A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 12, 2018, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties, within H operated by the victim G in the Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, and the first underground floor on April 12, 2018.

”, “ 아가씨를 불러 달라. ”라고 말하자 피해자가 방에 손님이 다 찼고, 아가씨를 불러 줄 수 없다는 말에 손님이 있는 노래방 룸 문을 열어 보고, “ 간석동에 아는 건달이 있는데 다 불러서 죽여 버리고 가게 문을 닫게 만든다.

“Along on about 20 minutes by having customers leave the disturbance, such as speaking, it interfered with the singing business of the victimized person by force.

2. The Defendant shall interfere with the business at the same place as indicated in paragraph 1 at around April 13, 2018 at around 00:15.

“A victim J, the police officer of the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station, who was dispatched to the site after receiving the report of 112, is the victim J, the police officer of the I District of the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station, and the Defendant who takes a bath, is the president G of the horse singing room and the K of the guest, and the police officer “D, the gue gue gue is bad” and the police officer is bad gue.

“......” and “..................”

“The police officer is in line with the police officer,” and was openly insulting by means of a large voice.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same date, time, and place as indicated in paragraph (2), and at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph (2), notified the above police officerJ of his desire to inform the Defendant of his personal information, and the above police officerJ notified the Defendant that he would arrest the Defendant in an act of interference with the duty and insult as a crime of interference with the duty of the Defendant, and the Defendant attempted to arrest the Defendant at least twice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to J, K, and G;

1. Written complaint by J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314(1) of the choice of punishment (Interference with business);