Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

A. On March 22, 2014, at around 23:30, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business, demanding the owner D (46 years of age, women) of the victimized person in the singing practice hall located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to “hyse a horse” and obstructed the Defendant’s singing business by force by forcing customers who sing out their singing in another room, with approximately 30 to 40 minutes of singing, including: (a) the victim’s “unsatisfy” and satisfyed “satisfy”, and satisfys and satfys.

B. On March 22, 2014, at around 23:58, the Defendant damaged the victim E (57 years of age, women) who was contacted with the said victim D on the street in front of the singing practice hall located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, for the reason that “the victim E (57 years of age, women) was faced with the said victim E” and “the victim was able to bring about about 20 minutes of age,” and the victim was able to drive the F vehicle at the end of 20 minutes of the instant vehicle and walked two times of the front door of the repair estimate, thereby impairing its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. To record part of the statement made by a witness D recorded in a file for recording a legal system among the seven-time public trial records;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Damage photographs (the defendant and defense counsel shall deny the crime of interfering with the business set forth in paragraph (1) 1;

However, on the day of the instant case, the Defendant’s statement made by D on the day of the instant case by the Defendant in a singing practice room, and the content of D’s statement about the disturbance from an investigative agency to this court is consistent with the main part (a part not consistent appears to be the limitation of memory due to the passage of time) from the investigative agency to this court, and the witness E also has been in a singing practice after having contact D with D that the Defendant chilled with the Defendant.

I stated that their statements were false and contained in their statements.

there is credibility because there is no evidence to find out the circumstances to be seen.

The decision is judged.

According to each of the above statements, the defendant runs a singing business as stated in the facts constituting a crime.