logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.08.21 2018고정721
직업안정법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person running a fee job placement business that provides female contact loans under the trade name of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C”.

A person who intends to provide domestic fee-charging job placement services shall register with a branch office of a Special Self-Governing Province having jurisdiction over the location of the main office.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without registering with the competent authority on May 2017, operated a fee job placement service from around the above place, and around September 17:37, 2017, operated a fee-charging job placement service in the manner of arranging “Esing room” in Seoul Songpa-gu D, and “Esing room” on the ground of underground floors as a contact loan, and receiving KRW 6,000 per hour and KRW 12,00,00 for two hours from the above non-personal contact loan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Investigation reports (the investigation of CCTVs at I cafeterias), investigation reports (the confirmation of contact point of the C cafeterias), and the application of statutes;

1. Article 47 subparagraph 1 of the relevant Act and Articles 47 and 19 (1) of the Act on the Stabilization of Employment and Stability of Punishment for Criminal Facts; Selection of fines;

1. In light of the fact that the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the custody of the Nowon-gu Station, the Defendant had the power to be subject to criminal punishment for the same crime, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the trial of this case, such as the type and scale of the Defendant’s business, do not seem to exceed the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order.

arrow