1. The Defendant is based on the transfer from the Plaintiff on February 27, 2017 regarding the motor vehicle indicated in the separate sheet.

In addition to the purport of the entire argument in the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiff is registered as the owner of the motor vehicle listed in the annexed sheet, the plaintiff and the defendant prepared a written agreement containing the content that the defendant would have received ownership transfer registration by April 30, 2017, on February 27, 2017, and the defendant submitted the above written agreement to his criminal case (Cheongju District Court 2016No1545) around March 2017.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to take over the transfer registration procedure from the plaintiff on February 27, 2017 with respect to the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet, except in extenuating circumstances.

On March 21, 2017, the defendant prepared the above agreement as a condition to release him/her from the military court on March 21, 2017.

6. 9. The plaintiff asserts that there is no obligation to accept the vehicle listed in the separate sheet since it was released from his office. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the agreement (Evidence A No. 1) without such content.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition.