Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 2, 2013, at around 15:50, the Defendant driven a Cpoter vehicle, and proceeded at a speed of about 87K km from the Hacheon-dong, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong, to the west-dong, Seocheon-dong, Daejeon-dong, at a speed of about 15K km.

The location is equipped with signal apparatus, the intersection of the accident area is designated as a children protection area, and the driver has a duty of care to check signal, etc. on the road and to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear and other devices with a speed in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded in violation of the signal, and the Defendant found the victim D (the 34 years old)'s Eudio vehicle in the drive of the victim D (the 34 years old) which was left to the left from the right side of the direction of the proceeding at the intersection where there is no signal device from the front side of the Cheongcheon, and operated an operation to avoid the collision, but did not keep the speed, and there was a conflict between the back side of the driver's seat on the part of the victim's vehicle.

The Defendant suffered from the victim's occupational negligence by taking care of the lower part of the lower part of the right side, which requires seven weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. The defendant alleged that his judgment on the defendant's assertion of the actual situation survey report, diagnosis report, speed calculation, and signal cycle chart did not violate the traffic signal, so it is scambling, the defendant's statement at the investigative agency that he entered the intersection for left-hand turn, and the defendant's statement that he would accurately know the victim's consistent statement that he entered the intersection for left-hand turn, the passage of the defendant is 70km speed per hour prior to entering the intersection, and the passage of the defendant is 70km speed per hour, and the intersection expires.