logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.03.12 2014고단4000 (2)
결혼중개업의관리에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Man-Ma4000] C is a disguised marriage broker who recruits nationals who have difficulty in economic conditions, and prepares marriage documents, etc. so that they can enter the Republic of Korea and enter the Republic of Korea and make a marriage by linking with Vietnam who wants to be employed. The defendant is a Korean woman who has agreed to receive compensation and make a disguised marriage with D (Vetnam women). The defendant is a person who has introduced the defendant to C to arrange a disguised marriage by introducing the defendant as a recruitment measure for recruiting men to make a disguised marriage under C's instructions, and the F is a person who has arranged a disguised marriage with C, along with the above D's disguised marriage.

C requested E to introduce “in the event of a person who is married to Korea,” and E recruited the defendant on July 2013 on condition that he would pay all the expenses for Vietnam travel and introduce C to C, and F recruited D, a Vietnam female who will be a disguised marriage with the defendant.

C agreed to file a marriage report with the Defendant without genuine will of marriage by giving the Defendant the amount of KRW 4 million to the Defendant, having the Defendant receive KRW 2 million with the fee, preparing documents necessary for the marriage report, and having the F receive KRW 15 million including various expenses from D, in order to file a marriage report without genuine will of marriage.

On November 27, 2013, the Defendant and Jongno-gu Office in Jongno-gu, Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, submitted a marriage report to a public official in charge of family relationship registration as if the Defendant had no genuine intention to marry with D, and had the public official enter the content of the marriage in the Defendant’s family relationship information system, thereby reporting false facts to the public official and entering false facts in the public electronic records system of family relationship registration, and around that time, entered the public electronic records containing false facts of marriage into the public electronic records system.

arrow