The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for one year and four months, respectively.

except that this shall not apply.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence (one and half years of imprisonment with prison labor, and two years of imprisonment with prison labor, and two years of imprisonment with prison labor) declared by the court below against the Defendants.

2. Determination

A. Although Defendant A had been punished once for the same crime as that of this case, Defendant A committed each of the crimes of this case, Defendant A conspired to acquire ownership of the above real estate by forging a certificate of borrowing under the name of the deceasedJ, the real estate owner, and obtaining a favorable judgment in order to block ownership of the real estate presumed to be deceased, Defendant A conspired to acquire ownership of the above real estate by filing a loan lawsuit on the ground of the forgery of the certificate of borrowing under the name of the deceased J and obtaining a favorable judgment. Defendant A forged the certificate of borrowing under the name of the deceased J and submitted two forged copies to Seoul Central District Court while filing a lawsuit against the deceased J, and used them. In light of the law of the crime, danger, etc., the nature of the crime is very poor. However, Defendant A was not subject to the punishment of a more severe punishment. Defendant A was not subject to the punishment of a more severe punishment, and Defendant A’s intent to deposit the above real estate in the name of the deceased real estate with the intent of Defendant 50 million won or more before and after the judgment of the court below, Defendant A’s occupation and circumstances.

B. Although Defendant B attempted to destroy evidence at an investigative agency, Defendant A led to a crime until the trial was held.