Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the auditor of the E, and the defendant A was the external third village of the B, and was the relative by marriage between the network F and the net F.

The Defendants anticipated that (State) E was forced to enforce a compulsory execution against the claim for the construction cost that the Defendants are obliged to pay to G and 7 persons (States). Although Defendant A did not hold at all the claims in the State, the Defendants pretended that the (States) E had a debt equivalent to KRW 290,000 for the Dong Construction (States) of the (States) E, thereby falsely transferring the claim for the construction cost of KRW 290,000,000 for the (States) Dong Construction (States) under the name of Defendant A to Defendant A, and conspired with LF to receive money by filing a false lawsuit against the Dong Construction (States) under the name of Defendant A.

Accordingly, the networkF created the same transaction statement that Defendant A lent money from Defendant A with a deposit passbook and a security card and made the same transaction statement. On March 8, 2011, the networkF pretended that (i)E bears the obligation equivalent to KRW 290,000,000 for the (ju) Dong Construction) under the name of Defendant A, and (ii) signed a contract on the transfer of the claim for the construction cost of KRW 290,000,000 for the (ju) Dong Construction (ju) under the name of Defendant A, and (iii) instructed Defendant B to receive the payment of the construction cost to be received by Defendant A, by filing a lawsuit against Defendant A on May 201.

Accordingly, Defendant A had a personal seal impression and seal impression necessary for the lawsuit against Defendant B, and Defendant B had a net branch of the Gwangju District Court located in the king-si on May 17, 2011. Defendant A had an application for payment order (201j915) against the third debtor under the above false bond transfer and takeover contract under the name of Defendant A, and attempted to induce the court. However, Defendant B had an objection to the same construction on June 7, 201.