The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is not that the Defendant received from the complainant G with the seal affixed in the column for the receipt of the down payment of each of the instant contracts from G, and received consent from G, and made up only each signature with the seal affixed thereto.

Nevertheless, the court below found guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. On January 208, the Defendant forged private document: “E Child Care Center operated by the Defendant located in B, Gyeongdong-gun, Gyeongdong-gun, the Defendant stated that “F shall rent KRW 40,00,000 to the Defendant for 60,000 monthly rent; “F shall rent KRW 40,000,000,000 to the Defendant”; “F shall pay KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,000,00,00,00,00.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, the Defendant each of the instant contracts, including a real estate lease contract in the name of F and a real estate lease contract in the name of G (hereinafter “instant contract”).