logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.10.05 2016고합126
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(주거침입강간)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A property damage and a residential intrusion Defendant found at the victim D’s house located in Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si on January 9, 2013, and did not meet the victim. As a result, the Defendant: (a) laid the front door glass and laid the front door by hand; (b) opened the front door and opened the front door; and (c) invaded the victim’s residence with the repair cost of KRW 90,000,000.

2. On April 19, 2013, around 19:00, on the first and second day of April 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim, who was frighting home together with his her her friend, with her her friend, “a fluent talk with her friend,” and her fluencing, towing, or pushing the victim with her

3. Around May 22, 2013, the Defendant, a multi-family housing, invaded upon the victim’s residence by taking the victim’s house 1st floor gate, which was a multi-family housing, and by taking the victim’s house gate in front of the entrance gate of the second floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The list of evidence submitted by the prosecutor, including photographs of damage to property and the list of repair cost, is indicated as “repair time,” but it is obvious that it is a clerical error in the “repair cost.”

Judgment on the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel in the receipt, the 112 Reporting Report List

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The Defendant did not assault the victim as described in Paragraph 2 of the judgment.

B. The Defendant entered the victim’s door door, such as the statement in Paragraph 4 of the judgment. However, since he was in school with the victim at the time, he did not constitute an act against the victim’s will.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this court, the Defendant’s assertion that this part of the facts charged is without merit.

(1) The victim shall be from the investigative agency to this court.

arrow