1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 25, 1996, the Plaintiff is an employee who had been engaged in the automobile assembly business after becoming a small and medium-scale factory, a corporation in the Young Automobile (hereinafter “instant factory”).

B. On July 26, 2016, the Plaintiff was on duty in the instant plant, and around 20:10, after having performed the Eddialton match in the factory, and caused a pain to the right shoulder, and visited the B Hospital located in the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and was diagnosed as “the part of the Edics for the Edics for the Edics for the Edics for the Edics for the Edics for the Edics for the instant disease” (hereinafter “instant injury”). On December 28, 2016, the Plaintiff applied for medical care benefits for the Edics for the instant injury.

C. The Defendant recognized the instant injury and disease on the Plaintiff’s film medical data, such as MRI, and recognized the Plaintiff’s long-term service, on the ground that, in light of the content and intensity of the work, the physical burden, and the degree of exposure to the attitude, etc., the Defendant’s overall cumulative physical burden on the shoulder part of the shoulder is low and thus, the proximate causal relation with the instant injury and disease is not acknowledged, on February 20, 2017.

A. [The facts that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 9-1, 2, and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that there was no special accident or credit while working for about 20 years since he joined the factory of this case, and as a result, the plaintiff must put an excessive burden on shoulders by putting up repeatedly straws while assembling the engine. Thus, since the disease of this case occurred through repeated work for a prolonged period of about 20 years average daily working volume of about 500 days per day, a proximate causal relation between the plaintiff's work and the above injury and disease, the defendant's disposition of this case should be revoked as unlawful.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

(c) judgment;