1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 1, 2002, the Plaintiff is an employee who had been employed in the Sourri Factory Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant factory”) and worked in the first factory painting B.

B. On June 8, 2016, at the instant plant around 10:03, the Plaintiff: (a) visited the Incheon Gyeyang-gu Hospital as a result of the visit to the Incheon Gyeyang-gu Hospital due to a pain on the left-hand shoulder while running a knife string and singing the knife of the knife vehicle at the instant plant; and (b) issued a written opinion stating that “each of the instant diseases was diagnosed by the superior of the knife and the knife (hereinafter “each of the instant diseases”); and (c) determined that the knife and the knife of the knife caused by the accumulated line of credit at the Anife Hospital, the Plaintiff applied for the first medical care benefit for each of the instant diseases to the Defendant on August 30, 2016.

C. On October 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) observed some of the left-hand boxes' price in the interior work; (b) however, it is difficult to view that the frequency of work is not excessive and the period of performing the pertinent work is long; and (c) most of the duties are performed by using the right hand; (d) on the ground that the cumulative burden of the left-hand shoulder is not high; and (e) there is no proximate causal relation with the duties of the instant upper branch, the Defendant rendered a disposition of refusal of medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

On January 13, 2017, the plaintiff filed a petition for review with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Since the Plaintiff’s assertion was entered on February 1, 2002 and repeated work to bear the left-hand shoulder for a long time for about 13 years and 9 months, and thus, there was a proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s work and the above injury and disease. Thus, this case’s assertion is different.