logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.09.23 2015고단1425
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 through 5 shall be confiscated, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The criminal defendant was a shipbuilding of the People's Republic of China's nationality and an international telephone financial fraud (one-time singing "Sing"; hereinafter "Singing")'s member of the criminal organization of the international telephone financial fraud (hereinafter "Sing"), and the person under whose name the person under whose name the statement made false statement that he/she would have the other party who received the telephone would misrepresent the staff of the financial institution and would have the other party receive the loan by misrepresenting himself/herself, and had the other party transfer the money to the designated account by his/her name. The defendant received the cash card and password from his/her early employee in accordance with the instructions given by the person under whose name the statement was not paid, and then remitted the money transferred from the victims to the account instructed by the person under whose name the name was not paid, and then conspired to prevent the criminal act of "Singing" by sharing his/her roles to receive KRW

On May 5, 2015, the Defendant received cash cards and passwords from a new bank account in the name of E in order to withdraw the amount of damage caused by scaming, in accordance with the direction of a person who has not been killed in the name.

On May 4, 2015, the name Buddhistist called the victim F by making a phone call to the victim F on May 4, 2015, and read the false statement to the effect that "I would get a loan. I would have the existing loan be repaid, so I would have the existing loan be repaid," and the victim G by making a phone call to the victim G on May 6, 2015, and "I would have the existing loan repaid. I would be able to obtain a credit loan at low interest, so I would have the existing loan repaid." On May 6, 2015, I would have the victim H make a loan to the victim H by making a phone from the French site around 13:00 on May 6, 2015, respectively.

However, in fact, the person who was not the person who was named in name was not the person who was the person who was not the person in question, and there was no intention or ability to receive the loan from the victims.

As above, a person who has been absent from the name of the victims.

arrow