A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

B On May 29, 2013, the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 401 KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.8 million entered into a lease contract and prepared a gambling place. Around that time, B prepared a gambling place by having the original table table table table, noise prevention unit, card box, card box, chips, chips, chairs, etc., and then strawing up with the string, and prepared to open a gambling place by guiding gambling participants, reporting the network, and recruiting employees, such as soliciting customers, etc.

B, from around 19:00 on September 10, 2013 to 19:50 on the same day, from 19:00 on September 10, 2013 to 19:50 on the same day, B opened a gambling house for the purpose of profit-making, such as having the participants of the daily table table 401 in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, D and E distribute the card to the participants of gambling, and having them do gambling, a method in which the total number of the open cards is equal to 9:0,000,000 won.

On September 10, 2013, from around 14:08 to 14:11 of the same day, the Defendant recruited the participants in gambling by sending text messages to the participants in gambling in the above gambling place, which read that “gambling in the gambling place” was called “gambing in the gambling place.”

Accordingly, the defendant assisted B by allowing B to easily recruit participants in gambling and aiding and abetting B's opening of gambling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to telephone statements and investigative reports (the content of message);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 247 and 32(1) of the Criminal Act that applies to the crime, the choice of imprisonment ( considered to have committed the crime in this case again by a defendant who has served twice as punishment for the same kind of crime)

1. Articles 32(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for aiding and abetting and mitigation;

1. Suspension of execution is set forth in Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 60(3) of the Juvenile Act, and Article 60(3) of the Juvenile Act.