1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who sets up 73,268 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff farm”) totaling approximately 34 parcels, including approximately 34 parcels, such as C, Do, Do, Do, Do, L, Si, Gyeongyeong-si, Gyeongyeong-si, Gyeongcheon-gun M, Gyeongcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, and Gyeongcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-do (hereinafter “Plaintiff farm”). The size of the above farm has been somewhat changed each year), and the Defendant sells agricultural chemicals with Q “R” in Q around Gyeong-si.

B. On August 21, 2016, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s pesticide company operated by the Defendant in order to purchase the pesticide “T” produced by S [effective ingredients are beauty protein for the purpose of remedying spacin economic scale] with beauty protein, and the Defendant recommended the Plaintiff to purchase “fishing” produced by Korea T” (hereinafter “Korea T”) instead of “T” (hereinafter “Korea T”), and the Plaintiff purchased “fishing” as recommended by the Defendant at the same time. At the same time, the Plaintiff purchased the “T” as “non-protein” [i.e., decinate and spacinicide for the purpose of remedying spacinines] and “carbio” (i.e., active ingredients are chroprophin).

C. From August 22, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) mixed with “fish”, “Tone Star”, and “kbio”; (b) spreaded to the entire area of the Plaintiff’s farm; and (c) around September 1, 2016, the Plaintiff, after spraying pesticides as above (based on the business mold of a resident agricultural technology center dispatched at the Plaintiff’s request, from September 1, 2016 (based on the business mold of the resident agricultural technology center dispatched to the site) to the Plaintiff farm; and (d) the phenomenon that the Plaintiff’s decline and leaves of the Plaintiff farm fall together from the reduction trees of the Plaintiff farm was generated in most farms, excluding 12,581 square meters of

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant falling accident”). D.

In the case of the reduction of the term "obsting the effect of fishing" purchased by the Plaintiff, the term "obsting the effect of fishing" has recently changed.