logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2016.05.27 2014가합1822 (1)
용역대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 128,457,380 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from August 29, 2014 to May 27, 2016, and the following.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 14, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a design service contract, etc. (hereinafter “instant service contract”) with a content that the Defendant receives from the Defendant the construction design for the urban environment rearrangement project in the Gu Won-si District in the cost of KRW 1,789,100,000 (excluding value-added tax) (hereinafter “instant service contract”).

Article 4 (Method of Calculation and Payment of Service Costs) ① The basis and method of calculation of the service costs shall be based on the consideration criteria, provided that, in the event that on-site conditions and design conditions are special or work conditions are added, the plaintiff and the defendant may consult with each other. ② The payment of the service costs may be made in lump sum or in installments. The payment of the service costs may be made in cash within 30 days from the date of the claim (However, the payment of the cost to be made in the service contract shall be made within one week from the date of the loan of the work costs from the association.

(3) At the time of receipt of construction deliberation, 20% project implementation authorization (the time of supply for reporting commencement) 30%, 30%, 10%, 10%, 100%, 3%, and 100%, from the completion of construction, the time of payment and the amount of payment shall be as follows, in principle, and may be adjusted through consultation between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

B. 1 The Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff’s claim for the payment of down payment, was requested to issue an electronic tax invoice on an amount of 20% to be paid at the time of the service contract by the Defendant and request for the issuance of the electronic tax invoice.

arrow