1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts mentioned below 2. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

2. Parts of scraping;

A. On June 25, 2015, the first instance court’s 7th sentence “not raising an objection” following the following [In accordance with the facts acknowledged earlier and the evidence found earlier, the Plaintiff completed the act of proving most of the allegations in the lawsuit for the Defendant, including submission of a preparatory document (No. 2-7) to the full bench in charge of the claim for division of inherited property on April 21, 2015, until the Plaintiff submitted a resignation letter concerning the delegation of the lawsuit under the Plaintiff’s personal name, and even after submitting the above resignation letter and the letter of delegation of the lawsuit under the name of the Defendant and E, etc., it is reasonable to deem that the Plaintiff participated in the preparation of the special agreement (No. 4) on the allocation of inherited property between the Defendant and E on June 25, 2015. It is reasonable to deem that, as an attorney G of law firm, the last preparatory document (No. 2-8 of the above case’s inherited property) on June 30, 2015, the Plaintiff participated in the procedure of the instant case as one’s final settlement.

B. On the 7th 15th 15th 7th 15th 7th 201, “No exclusion shall be made in the calculation of the official fees”, and then, “the Plaintiff did not specifically contribute to the discovery of each land above

Even if Article 5 of the Agreement refers to the inherited property that was divided based on the calculation of successful remuneration, and “the inherited property directly discovered by the plaintiff so that the defendant can be divided.”