Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Lessee corresponding to the following additional payment order.
Reasons
1. The grounds for the final judgment of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment are the same as those for the judgment of the court of first instance other than by adding or adding the same as those for the judgment of the court of first instance as those for paragraph (2).
2. Parts which are added or dried up;
A. As to the part of the basic facts of the first instance judgment, “No. 11” as “No. 5 of the first instance judgment shall be written,” and “including “No. 12” shall be added, and the entire authenticity of the document shall be presumed to have been established, as the evidence No. 12 is recognized that the subsequent stamp image after the name of the counter-defendant is based on the seal of the counter-defendant. In this regard, although the counter-defendant asserted to the effect that the evidence No. 12 was forged by E, the evidence submitted by the counter-defendant alone is insufficient to acknowledge the assertion and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.”
B. As to the portion of the “claim for Payment of Fees by Subrogation”, the following is added to the third instance judgment of the first instance, following the 18th instance judgment:
1) The counterclaim Defendant asserts that the counterclaim Defendant incurred the liability of the counterclaim Defendant by means of manipulating the recovery amount of the insurance solicitor’s fees by Nonparty Company and the Counterclaim Plaintiff, etc.
However, in light of the following circumstances recognized by the respective statements and arguments set forth in Eul evidence Nos. 12, 23, and 53 (including virtual numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the foregoing assertion by the counterclaim Defendant is difficult to accept. Even if based on the result of calculating the operating fee of a branch conducted under the responsibility of the head of the instant branch office, the enemy began to occur from February 2, 2014 to September 2014, and thereby, the amount of debt returned accumulated until September 2014 is KRW 28,43,896.
Specifically, examining the method of calculating the operating fee of the instant branch, the L branch office from January 201 to August 2014, which served as an office worker at the instant branch office.