Text
1. The punishment of the defendant shall be determined by six months;
2. Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant, who had been divorced six years before her husband's divorceed, was the child born by the victim B, and was found as an apartment residing by the victim B before her husband, and had been able to escape from the disturbance about to visit the victim. However, the victim B, who was not the defendant, was able to keep the victim B, and the apartment living by the victim C of his wife C, purchased gasoline (20 liters amounting to 20 liters, 15,000 won) at the fluoral station in the trade name, in order to keep the victim B and the apartment living by the victim C.
On August 3, 2016, at around 23:40, the Defendant prepared a fire at 103 Dong 1006, 103, and 1006 of the instant apartment that the victims used as a residence, for the following reasons: (a) the gasoline purchased as mentioned above was rootsd around the fluor, “I opened a door as soon as possible, spread the gasoline, and spread the gasoline”; and (b) the victims used as a residence.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement concerning C and B;
1. Each report on investigation;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the list of 112 Reporting Cases;
1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is highly likely to pose a high risk of danger by spreading gasoline and preparing fire prevention in an apartment building, which is an aggregate building in which people live.
This is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant.
The defendant is the first offender, and all of the crimes of this case are led to confession and reflect.
When the defendant promised not to find victims in the future, the victim C did not want to be punished by the defendant, and the victim B expressed the intention that it would be well resolved in a way that the defendant would not find the victims in the future rather than punishment of the defendant.
This is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.
(b) other.