The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant did an act of being challenged by the victim A, etc. against the victim A, or that he/she did not carry with him/her the wall that is a dangerous object and display it.

2. Determination

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the victim, F, G’s respective legal statements, damaged photographs, etc., and written injury diagnosis.

B. In addition to the reasoning of the judgment of the court below, the following circumstances that can be acknowledged by evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below and the court below, namely, ① the victim, F, and G’s statement: (a) the circumstance and process where the defendant carried with a gate, which is a dangerous object to dispute with the victim and caused him to the victim; (b) the defendant again started to run the game in the same machine; (c) there was a dispute between the victim pointed out and the defendant again; (d) the victim and the defendant appeared to go out of the game; and (e) the victim appeared to put the wall in the main machine with the victim's door; (e) the defendant met with the victim’s hand when the victim wlved with the victim, and wlved with the victim; (e) the defendant’s face when the defendant made a statement outside of G fighting; (e) the defendant made a statement to the police wlved with the victim’s face; but (e) the defendant made a statement to the police wlved with the victim.