beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year, for Defendant B.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Defendant A]
1. On August 2015, the Defendant, at the “E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” office for the victim in Pyeongtaek-si, who was a member of the “F” group of the Defendant’s “F” group in Pyeongtaek-si, the Chairperson of the G new Provincial Association, takes office in the United Kingdom and takes office in the president of the HH Foundation. If he/she takes office and returns to the president, he/she will engage in the Human People’s Support Project, and he/she is unrefilledd at that time. He/she borrowed money to the United Kingdom because the expenses need to be borne by the Chairperson; and if he/she takes office as the president and returns to the United Kingdom, he/she will repay money to several times.”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not own any property in its name and was in a bad credit position due to taxes in arrears, and even if B did not have any money, it was impossible to recover the money, such as the repayment of the said money, even if B provided money to B, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money from the victim.
Around August 12, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5 million from the victim via the I Account (Account Number:J) in the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 7 million from the victim on February 2, 2016 by deceiving the victim by the aforementioned method.
2. On March 1, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at the same place as the early policeman (“Seoul”) stating that “I would like to gather well-known persons, such as K, from Seoul to the H Foundation, and prepare for one-way shock before he or she saw the expenses of the United Kingdom. In March, 2016, I would like to have to repay the money in several times if I will lend the money to the Defendant.”
However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.
The defendant deceivings the victim as such and let the victim do so on the same day by the Mbank account (Account Number: N) in the name of the defendant designated on the same day, and 28 million won.