logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.06.26 2018고단1897
폭행
Text

[Defendant A]

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

2018 Highest 1897

2. Defendant A and Defendant B met the victim’s face on the ground that, at around 09:00 on January 16, 2018, the victim C (the age of 19) who was drinking alcohol at the same place as that of paragraph (1) was first viewed as “the victim C(the age of 19)” and the victim C her first seeed as “the victim’s face.”

이에 피해자가 소주병으로 피고인 A의 머리를 1회 내리치자, 피고인 B은 피해자가 소주병으로 친구인 피고인 A를 때렸다는 이유로 발로 피해자의 몸을 수회 찼고, 피고인 A는 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 수회 때렸다.

Since then, Defendant A continued to walk out of the victim and the above officetel, and continued to walk the victim at once, and the victim's face again due to drinking.

As a result, the defendants jointly put up the body of the victims, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

3. Defendant C was assaulted by the victim A (19) on the same grounds as that set forth in paragraph (2) at the same date, time, and place as that set forth in paragraph (2), and the victim was assaulted by the victim’s head on one occasion due to the main illness, which is a dangerous object from chemicalization.

Defendant A, on April 14, 2018, 2018, 1965 / [Defendant A] brought an dispute with the worker's club in front of the exit 1 in Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, 309, "Gasan Digital Single District" in Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, about the above assault case, he received 112 report in relation to the above assault case and was dispatched to the site, and was able to look at this situation of the police officer, who was dispatched to the site, under the influence of alcohol, the police officer I spath of the police officer I spath under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

2018 Highest 1897 / [Defendant]

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Photographs of the victim A or C damage;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate and each medical certificate;

1. A criminal investigation report (suspect C J.

arrow