The defendant shall be sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 3 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes set forth in the judgment of the court below.

Punishment of the crime

On June 21, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court on June 21, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 29th day of the same month, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on July 15, 201.

1. On November 2009, the Defendant made a false statement at the office of the (ju) C of the Defendant’s operation in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, that “The Defendant would sell to the staff in charge of the Defendant’s Seongdong-gu Fisheries Cooperatives, who supplied the flag, and then would pay the price.”

However, in fact, the defendant was suffering from economic difficulties such as failure to pay the price for the goods supplied to another company, and thus there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the victim was supplied with a balance.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was delivered from November 3, 2009 to December 27, 200 the amount of KRW 71,339,50,000 to five times from November 3, 2009.

2. Around December 21, 2009, the Defendant, at the office of the said state-C around December 21, 2009, concluded that “The Defendant requested the staff in charge of the Seongbuk-gu Fisheries Cooperatives to supply the 150 boxes to be 150 boxes to be sent in the Maymart, because he requested the staff in charge of the Defendant’s Seongdong-gu Fisheries Cooperatives to supply the

However, the above 150 winners ordered D, a personal transaction company of the defendant, rather than the order of the NAF, and 13,050,000 won out of the price of the goods remitted by D to the account in the name of the victim's association, which was the fact that the defendant erroneously remitted to the account in the name of the victim's association, and was used individually by the victim's association after being returned from the victim's association, so there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if it was supplied by the victim's association.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was issued 150 boxes and market price of 17,400,000 won to the same day by deceiving the victim.

3. On March 2010, the Defendant was held in the distribution of agricultural cooperatives in Gangnam-gu Seoul Yang Jae-dong.