Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 13, 2017, around 03:40 on November 13, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, within the C cafeteria operated by the Defendant, and “the husband committed an assault” in the “C cafeteria operated by the Defendant upon receipt of the Defendant’s report,” where the slope E belonging to the Jeju Western Police Station D police station called out to the Defendant separated the husband and the Defendant, and when he listens to each statement, the Defendant committed an assault by pushing the Defendant on the chest part of the Party E in the course of listening to the Defendant’s statement.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officials concerning 112 reporting processing affairs.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the same time and at the same place as indicated in the preceding paragraph, and at the same time and place as indicated in the preceding paragraph, destroyed the floor by putting the cell phone inquiry device of No. 39, which was used by the Defendant in hand for the purpose of evidenceing, and continuously walking the cell phone inquiry device that fell on the floor, thereby damaging the cell phone inquiry device of the amounting to 224,000 won at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (calculated amount of damage);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the point of impairing goods for public use);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Imposition of a fine in an appropriate amount by taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the Defendant; (b) the fact that there is no particular criminal history other than once of a fine; and (c) the fact that damage is not large;