Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with the execution of official duties in the support of the Suwon Friwon, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 20, 2017.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car owned by C. C.

1. On November 7, 2016, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.120% at a distance of about 200 meters from a 200-meter radius to the front road located in Ansan-si, a member D at Ansan-si, Ansan-si. In addition, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.120% at a distance of about 200 meters to the front road of the same Gu.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act due to the damage of occupational and actual property caused by the destruction of a road by driving the driver car above the border of a day, such as Paragraph 1, and led him to turn to the left of the front road in front of the members of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the front of the F, the Gulsan-si.

Since there are many vehicles parked due to the concentration of commercial buildings, etc., a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front door and the left door and the left door and the left door, and by accurately manipulating the steering and steering devices.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was parked in a Madern by negligence.

G The part on the part of the upper part of the HH Hastrop car, etc. on the left side of the said Hastrop car, etc. shall be shocked with the front part of the Hastrop car and continued to be parked on the left side of the front side.

I The J Poter's driver's seat and even part of the J Poter's car are shocked in front of each of the above Poter's car, and the above Poter's freight was pushed back and parked behind.

The front part of the Lone Star Co., Ltd. owned by K was shocked into the rear part of the cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the foregoing vehicle by occupational negligence, the cargo vehicle, the cargo vehicle, and the Lone Star Co., Ltd.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A report on actual condition of the police;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. The principal driver;